Kant and Categorical Imperatives Essay

In cab bet to evaluate ones chipions whether they be moral or non, we use many moral dilemmas. One of them is Kants compressed dogmatic. This essay presents Kants project of matte imperative. Then, I ordain explain that rulers should put forward to Kants flavorless imperative when do inappropriate polity decision. In site to support my point of view, I give give importance to the intellectuals of why rulers appeal to categorical imperative when making unknown policy, so I have two reasons for this.One of them is that bows weigh on each former(a) in economically and politically. Thus, in order to pass on this stability which actor that continue to stay among other states, states should act through the principles of categorical imperative which are ecumenically valid, good bearing and never using volume or other states as message to end. The second reason is that if rulers appeal to categorical imperative when making foreign policy decisions, the solid grou nd bathroom be more peaceful.Since, wars and conflicts which are caused by bad goal, using other people or states as elbow room for gaining advantages which are not universally valid dismiss be hindered by categorical imperatives. Finally, I will conclude that the Kants categorical imperatives are still valid and necessary when rulers are making foreign policy decisions. If we explain briefly Kants categorical imperative, there are fundamentally three principles that represent it. These are universal law, ends as a means and the importance of intention in conducting of human behaviour.Firstly, according to Kant, ones action should be universally valid. Universal validity means that people should say behaviours and they need to judge their own behaviours or actions are morally acceptable or not. When you think of your behaviour, if you decide that everyone acts in the same counseling with me, then the action become universal and moral. The second principle of categorical imper ative is that people must respect others and never use them for achieving nigh goals. Lastly, the third just now the well-nigh important criterion of categorical imperative is maxim, which means intention.Moral value is determined by the intention of people, which is called existence-wide maxim. If your intention is good, then your action is moral. The consequences of your action are not important, the most important thing is your intention. For this reason, being moral in your actions depends on the universal validity. However, it does not matter that how your actions conclude on others whether they are good or bad. In order to explain the first reason of why rulers should appeal to categorical imperative when making foreign policy decisions, we can think about the growing trade between the states.States become more dependent when trades among various states expand. Interdependence is not only important economically but also politically because all economic or business dril l depends on political positions of the states. When states trade between each other, they become inversely dependent on each others political advantages. Also, institution markets are influenced by politics and states power in the world markets depends on its foreign policy. So, states should establish good relations with other states.For this reason, when making foreign policy decisions, ruler should appeal to categorical imperative. Firstly, rulers actions must be universally valid. If states foreign decisions are internally valid, then state cannot benefit from this politically and economically. For example, if the state decide to depart the price of its export goods up without approval of other states, then states could not sell its goods whose price increase, because other states want to buy the same goods from another(prenominal) country whose price is cheaper.Second point is that if states intention is bad and this salmagundi of intention is understood by other states, t his state is reproached by other states, which have a relation with this state. As a result of this, the state that is reproached becomes alone in the world market and world policy without any advantage both politically and economically. Because of that, states should have a good intention when they have relations with other states. The second reason is that principles of categorical imperative can provide peace and order if rulers appeal to them when making foreign policy decisions.Since, states start to think universally plot of ground acting toward other states instead of being self-interested. Moreover, acting with good intentions and not using people or other states as means provide justice and order in the world. Since, each state wants to be properly and they try to get more power than other states. It means that in order to reach their aims, they simply can use other foreign policy actors as tools. In other words, they can use other states as a means to their ends. As a re sult of this kind of action, war between states is inevitable.It is because when one state can act in that way toward others then, other states also act in similar way. For this reason, their interests can be credibly conflicted and chaos in world politics can arise. However, if states take into account the principles of categorical imperative, there will be probably no conflict or chaos in the world politics. In conclusion, when the principles of categorical imperative are concerned, we easily realise that they depend on each other and they help us to evaluate the actions, which are moral.These principles of categorical imperative have the same goal that is being moral. For to be moral, the actions should be universal and should not have the aim of using others in order to gain advantages. If rulers conduct through the principles of categorical imperative then, it is obvious that the world would be more peaceful and fair. However, these obligations are not put into use in todays w orld politics. But, it is enough to know that categorical imperative is still valid and is necessary to apply to todays conditions of foreign policy.